Talk:Half-Breed Tract

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Hillmap in topic Half-breeds

Half-breeds edit

It might be useful to give a review of the membership/descent criteria of a few of the tribes in these states - in some cases in other areas, mixed-blood children by a father in the tribe were accepted if the mother had been adopted (thinking of older Iroquois practice. There were other issues about family and clan.--Parkwells (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am writing a Ph.D. dissertation on the Iowa Half-Breed Tract and have also done quite a bit of research on the Minnesota Tract. I think the section on the Iowa tract could benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the Decree of Partition in 1841. The Decree of Partition split the tract into 101 shares of just over 1,000 acres a piece and specified which "half-breed" owner each plot belonged to. By then, land speculators with ties to eastern groups like the New York Land Company had bought up most of the mixed-race peoples' shares, so the Decree effectively gave eastern land speculators control of the land. The situation was complicated by the white squatters who actually lived on most of the reservation. They had no intention of moving, even if the courts decided the land belonged to the speculators. A nasty legal battle ensued. Does anyone mind if I add some of this information to the article? Hillmap (talk) 21:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Canada edit

I got off into one of your sources, about Métis firsts in Canada and the US (Métis of Manitoba reference). What was striking were the number of highly educated métis in Canada who advanced to high positions in politics and government. Sometimes their progress seemed related to high-status fathers who gave them an education and also if their mothers were high status within First People tribes. In both countries, fathers worked harder to educate their sons.--Parkwells (talk) 21:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Half-breed tracts edit

It's a fascinating and huge story. You may need an overview article on the tracts here, then adding articles by state. Is that what you were thinking? I think it really helps to have one place where you treat the topic.--Parkwells (talk) 21:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I created Nemaha Half-Breed Tract. I don't think creating these per-state would be appropriate; per entity is better. It does strike me that these types of entities would have been all over these central states, particularly the fur trade states, but also Oklahoma. The South? The Northeast? Not sure, but maybe. They might have different names, but not similar to Canada there is no easy search term, i.e. Metis. Instead, half-breed, mixed blood, cross-breed... along with the naming of the tracts, which were reservations, reserves, tracts, and what more? It could be a complex search, but one I'll work on a bit. • Freechild'sup? 02:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Contrasts between Canada and US edit

It might be really interesting to look at some of the contrasts and comparisons, for instance, on land, etc. There's a big topic.--Parkwells (talk) 21:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kinship systems edit

It would be useful to research the kinship systems of these different tribes - since finding the article on how the Omaha rejected mixed-race children of white fathers as white, my interest is raised in this topic. Was going to try to assess this article for WP:Indigenous peoples of North America, and began to wonder about the patrilineal/matrilineal/hypodescent aspects again. Parkwells (talk) 17:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

This will likely be difficult as there had been so much social disruption by this period. I've started looking, though.Parkwells (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Half-Breed Tract. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply