Talk:Haitham al-Haddad

Vandalism from 188.29.42.224

This user User:188.29.42.224 deleted very important points regarding al-Haddad's extremism. I've reverted all changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blix1900 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Sources

This article needs better and more sources. At the moment, we only have the website of his own organisation as source. can anyone provide those sources?Jeff5102 (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

repeated vandalism from 188.29.42.224

Please can someone help, report him? I'm quite a wiki newbie. Thanks. Hamnavoe (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Repeated vandalism from 82.4.68.91

User:82.4.68.91 has repeatedly vandalised the page as well as hurl, what seem to be, insults at those who edit this page with integrity. Can we consider locking it, please?

This isn't the first time this page has been vandalised to white-wash the speaker's history. (See above). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blix1900 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC) —-- I think as well the page deserves to be locked. btw: guys - look into the Revision history at THIS comment: 11:18, 10 May 2012‎ 82.4.68.91 (talk)‎ . . (1,662 bytes) (-438)‎ . . (This contribution is vital and yours are false inventions. Truth, Justice and Peace 2, Far right, neo con, zionist,sufi, brelvi satan worshiper 0.) - HE IS CALLING US A SUFI SATAN WORSHIPPERS. That's a great magic of the unwanted... our vandalizing guy would be a Salafi (as Haddad) I think. He clearly hates sufi, that's a VERY bad sign... Hamnavoe (talk) 05:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

It hasn't even been 24 hours from his/her last ban and 82.4.68.91 has already started trolling this page. Glad Admin have warned him again. Please stop this - the constant violations are becoming tedious. Blix1900 (talk) 23:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

aha.. so the only reason whe he did stop vandalizing the page was because of his ban.... grim. He can't even use a talk... btw Blix you've added exactly what I wanted... really thanks.. being a Wiki-newbie ;) Hamnavoe (talk) 18:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Point 1.5

Hey User:Hamnavoe, that's a very interesting quote from al-Haddad. Pure supremacism, and definitely controversial as well as the fact it was given at such a prominent Mosque in the UK.

Could I ask you produce a short transcript of the point your making and add as a quote? It helps clear up anomalies although, after watching the video, it's clear he's controversial and a Islamist supremacist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blix1900 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Blix1900 sorry, I didn't get it... honestly, we have serious problem here in CZ, Haddad is going to have a lecture in a Prague Mosque tomorrow(!!) :( Unlike me, you're the native speaker.. so if you could fix and enhance my post a bit, I'd be delighted. We're giving out link to this article to the media just now. Hamnavoe (talk) 21:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Ahh, I see. No worries! I'll do this tomorrow. Blix1900 (talk) 21:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

thx... anyway.. maybe we could move that 1.5 point upwards? It really really tough I think. Nah... it's insane :( Hamnavoe (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced and NPOV content

WP:BLP and of course WP:NPOV apply to this article. Unsourced material will be removed. Do not add it. Alexbrn (talk) 09:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Alex. That part about Tablighi Jamaat was sourced... Hamnavoe (talk) 09:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Correct. That particular para was not removed because it was unsourced, but because it was a blatant piece of POV-pushing (as recorded in the edit summary). BLP's must be strictly NPOV. Alexbrn (talk) 09:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Unable to Make Changes to Article

Hi User:Hamnavoe. I'm not sure if you're the one to speak with on this issue. I am trying to edit an article on Wikipedia about Haitham al-Haddad. I feel the current article does not do a good job representing Dr. al Haddad in a holistic manner. However, a few minutes after making my entry, my article was replaced again by the previous article.

I did my best to keep my article factual and avoid any sort of bias in my article, therefore I don't understand why it has been rejected. Can you kindly assist me?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbsarKazmi (talk • contribs) 06:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Guys User:Starofislam + AbsarKazmi. Few months ago, a Wikipedia admin removed all unsourced information. The original article was much more detailed. Do you have any SOURCED info about Haddad's origins? Hamnavoe (talk) 21:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Haitham al-Haddad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222142111/http://www.islaam.net/main/display.php?id=1543 to http://www.islaam.net/main/display.php?id=1543
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307233052/http://www.huda.tv/huda-tv-programs/huda-stars/152-haitham-al-haddad to http://www.huda.tv/huda-tv-programs/huda-stars/152-haitham-al-haddad
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402130359/http://www.london24.com/news/crime/socalled_mega_mosque_fuels_protest_fears_ahead_of_newham_council_meeting_1_1730944 to http://www.london24.com/news/crime/socalled_mega_mosque_fuels_protest_fears_ahead_of_newham_council_meeting_1_1730944

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)