Talk:HMS Queen Charlotte (1790)

John Toulson

I get information abt. capt. John Toulson, as master of the Queen Charlott on the year 1799, 1800, date when he married on Lisbon and when he was father. The related notice is on the Lisbon registery of births and wednings. Pls, I want to be informed for the question.- Best regards, Fernando Toulson.- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lobtelde (talk • contribs) 15:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Dates

Is it correct that she was commissioned just a month after launch? Drutt (talk) 04:43, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Various online sites (e.g. this one) strongly suggest she entered service in the spring of 1793. I will change the article accordingly. Drutt (talk) 09:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The site you have linked to only covers ship services during the French Revolutionary Wars and beyond, and omits previous service. Commissionings for age of sail ships in the Royal Navy are somewhat problematic. Each commander had his commission, through which authority the Admiralty enabled him to take up command of a ship. The commission wasn't so much for the ship, it was for the officer who was to command her. In the case of Queen Charlotte, her commanding officer would have taken over and read his commission out to the newly assembled crew shortly after launching. It would then have been his responsibility to see that she was fitted for service. Queen Charlotte's first commander, Captain Roger Curtis, commissioned her in May 1790, as the flagship of Rear-Admiral John Leveson Gower. She was quickly fitted out for service as the Spanish Armament was at that time in full swing, with war with Spain hotly anticipated. She put to sea on 7 July 1790 and served as Lord Howe's flagship during the crisis, which eventually passed without breaking into war. Queen Charlotte was paid off later that year with the drawdown of the navy back to a peacetime footing, and did not return to active service until February 1793, when Britain became at war with Revolutionary France. Benea (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. Where did you obtain this information? Drutt (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

File:HMS Queen Charlotte.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:HMS Queen Charlotte.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:HMS Queen Charlotte.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Date of loss

A contemporary source gives the date of loss as 1 March 1800. Mjroots (talk) 07:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Queen Charlotte (1790). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090923202900/http://www.memorials.inportsmouth.co.uk/others/excellent/charlotte.htm to http://www.memorials.inportsmouth.co.uk/others/excellent/charlotte.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)