Talk:HMS Polychrest
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Polychrest article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | This article is maintained by the Napoleonic fiction working group, which may be able to help with questions about the topic, as well as verification and sources. |  |
Removed edit
I took this out of the article - I don't know what it means!
- Gefunden auf der Homepage eines britischen Marine-Liebhabers:
- Nach der deutschen Übersetzung spricht mehr für die HMS Project als Vorlage, als für die von :der Quelle erwähnten Schiffe der "Dart"-Klasse [redrobur, germany]
I also removed:
- The data below are for HMS Project (Lyon156):
- Launched Length Keel Breadth Hold Tonnage Crew
- 1806 70' 60' 5 1/4" 17' 6" 6' 6 1/2" 98 42/94 Unknown
- Armament: two howitzers-mortars
- http://members.aol.com/batrnq/images/WProject.jpg
for the time being (i.e. until I find out how it is relevent). Finaly I think I remember reading the second paragraph in a book - but I have yet to track it down to make sure. Andreww 04:19, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
missing stays linked to Tack (sailing) why? edit
The phrase 'missing stays' is linked to the Wikipedia article on Tack (sailing). Why? There is nothing in that brief article about missing stays. I found another article that gives a brief definition of 'missing stays': an unsuccessful attempt to tack. That is in Stays (nautical). I am no sailing expert, but it is annoying to follow a link and find no reason to be reading that article, relevant to the first article. Should the link be changed to this other article? --Prairieplant (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)