Talk:HMS Grafton (H89)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Grafton (H89) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

HMS Grafton (H89) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 5, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Grafton (H89)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
prose: (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments edit

1. stern. Link for this.

2. The ship's complement was 137 officers and men in peacetime. Suggest - You mention how many men she carried in wartime as well.

Done and done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns.

Sturm the GA machine, continues his rampage of articles on the destroyers of the Royal Navy. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Grafton badge.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image used in this article, File:Grafton badge.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic