Talk:HMS Glamorgan (D19)

Motto

I Fyny Bo'r Nod (Welsh - I Give Way To None)

The English is not a translation of the Welsh (which means somthing like "onward and upward"). Is it supposed to be or did the ship have separate mottoes? Flapdragon 19:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Exocet attacks

She twice survived unsuccessul Exocet attacks.

Given the Argentines had only five air launched Exocets, one of which hit Sheffield and two being used on Atlantic Conveyor, I find it unlikely both of the remaining pair happened to be used on Glamorgan! Toby Douglass 13:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

The Air Launched Exocets were the AM39 variant, of which the original contract with the French government was for 14 AM39 Exocets and 14 Super Etendard Aircraft. Only 5 of each were delivered before the arms embargo in early 1982. The Exocet that hit Glamorgan was an MM38 Variant which was housed in a canister and was probably removed from some of their warships. Eight of these were removed from the Argentine ships and flown to the Falklands. They were mounted in pairs on an improvised mobile launcher, as the text states. I agree the text needs to calrify this. Aquizard 23:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I have undertaken a few edits to improve the accuracy of this section on the exocet attack from the land based improvised launcher. Infact another 6 MM38 exocet missiles were delivered to the islands for use. Aquizard 17:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

One exocet hit Glamorgan, according to my father who heard a story when he served on her (after the war), the missile was actually intercepted, so instead of hitting the centre of the ship, it hit well aft, obviously it cannot be referenced, but there must be some account somewhere. (213.167.69.4 (talk) 08:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC))

MM40

Following discussions with a crew member who was onboard Glamorgan during the Falklands conflict, he has confirmed that the ship was loaded in late 1981, with 4 MM40 Exocet missiles not the MM38 as previously stated. Aquizard 09:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Exocet ITB.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Exocet ITB.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Exocet ITB.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

ITB translation

"Berreta" in Buenos Aires' slang or lunfardo means "vulgar", "tasteless" or "trashy". A user made an edit where he claims that the "literal translation" of "Berreta" is "pistol shot". As a non- native speaker of English maybe I was missing something like a colloquialism or a local variant of English, but searching on google I was unable to find anything different than a person pulling the trigger of a pistol. Therefore I've removed the statement.--Darius (talk) 02:34, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on HMS Glamorgan (D19). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090206014020/http://www.raf.mod.uk:80/falklands/pebble1.html to http://www.raf.mod.uk/falklands/pebble1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120423052601/http://www.britishlegion.org.uk/media/171079/poppypress.pdf to http://www.britishlegion.org.uk/media/171079/poppypress.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091211232552/http://www.britains-smallwars.com:80/RRGP/Lebanon.html to http://www.britains-smallwars.com/RRGP/Lebanon.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Vandalims and illega blocking of wiki editor Robert Frederick Fancourt Miles BA- Victoria, Wgtn, NZ BCom, BA(hons), Ma(Hons)- University of Canterbury by Material Scientist

Much of many of the wiki cold war articles on the RNZN and RN ships is written by me, nb Tiger,County GMD Minotaur, Superb/ Swiftsure, T21, Royalist ect and contributions and also many NZR locomotive sites and some US contribution , nb ree US Scorpion and possiblities of Soviet sub involvement and probability of it being hit by USN MK 37 or similar Soviet torpedo- because they could, and you don't know, would be my reply to Pravda. Having secured the ability to intercept usn communications in real time, they illustrated their capabilities. In terms of HMS Glamorgan my basic thesis is all its weapons are essentially useless, Seaslug, Seacat, Mk 6 4.5 etc and also the Bristish a/s torpedoes. Its armament is political to pretend that the UK is still capable of high tech missile development and boost export sales. The outdated gun rather than the developed auto 4 or twin 3 icn or L70 is to impress the public is the UK/RN is past supposedly obsolete guns. So my critique is not much different from comic actor Peter Cooks or Conrelli Barnetti- a nation in declien prefers a shadow force, strut and the illusion of supposed nuclear deterence. My articles were written anon at Epsom, Remuera, Parnell, Welligton Library( were their blocked- the location is next to Wellinton Central Police)and national library and any other sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.48.175.44 (talk) 04:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Glamorgan (D19). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.navynews.co.uk/news/1093-falklands-forgotten-ship-finally-honoured.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930064352/http://www.sama82.org.uk/garden/0/6/5/woodward.htm to http://www.sama82.org.uk/garden/0/6/5/woodward.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)