This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
HMS Chatham (1788) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I've converted his lk (to a Dab whose non-compliance with WP:MOSDAB may be designed to give him something that can pretend to be a WP bio) to plain text. I can't imagine why he is mentioned at all. --Jerzy•t 23:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Here's what the Dab page said abt him, based on one of the refs on the accompanying article:
Lieutenant James Hanson was 2nd officer on the HMS Chatham (1788) during its round-the-world explorations as part of the Vancouver Expedition, 1791-1795. He drowned January 1800. --Jerzy•t 23:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I found this article in an old newspaper archive online about a brig named the Chatham being shipwrecked (after 1830, so it corresponds with this article's information), and was curious as to whether it's the same Chatham as mentioned in this article. If so, is it worth including in this article? Link: https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/101734584/9711749#RobotSpark (talk) 07:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply