Talk:HMAS Protector (1884)

Military history: Maritime / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Australia: South Australia / Military history / Maritime Low‑importance

	Australia portal HMAS Protector (1884) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Image:Crest protector.gif‎ listed for deletion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Crest protector.gif‎, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- saberwyn 07:06, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why not use the same rationale used here [1] Spy007au (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Because the ship never used this ship badge design, or any incarnation of the Australian ship badge design, to identify itself. -- saberwyn 23:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

HMCS edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why HMCS?... There is no mention on Canada. Pibwl ←« 06:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The C in this instance stands for Colonial. Footnoted to explain. -- saberwyn 10:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bow edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is no mention of the apparent reconstruction of the bow between 1900 and 1901. --Epipelagic (talk) 05:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

What bow reconstruction are you talking about? If you have sources that say such a thing happened, please feel free to add. -- saberwyn 09:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMAS Protector (1884). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110317032229/http://www.navy.gov.au/Heritage_Centre_-_Online_Guided_Tour to http://www.navy.gov.au/Heritage_Centre_-_Online_Guided_Tour

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic