Talk:Gynecologic cancer disparities in the United States
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mtran99.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review edit
This article is very well-written, well-organized, and seems that it will be very comprehensive once the author fills in the sections/subsections she has created. I was particularly impressed by the comprehensiveness of the article, as the author does an excellent job of explaining the existing disparities in care (for each type of gynecologic cancer) and then goes on to explain the various factors that contribute to such disparities. The author can improve this article by providing a source for the last sentence in the introductory paragraph, as it is currently unsourced. Making this change will ensure that all of her statements are credible. The author can also improve this article by avoiding the passive voice and instead using the active voice in her statements. This will improve the overall readability of the article by making each statement easier to comprehend. The most important thing the author can do to improve the article is to provide a source for the last statement in the introductory paragraph. Making sure that no statements are left uncited is incredibly important, as it will help avoid accidental/unintentional plagiarism. Overall, excellent work and I look forward to reading your future additions!Sraman195 (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review Two edit
I think you’ve done a really good job of laying out the different fronts on which gynecological cancers differ for different racial/social groups. I like the structure that facilitates this. Going forward, I think you need to look into things outside of the realm of each cancer. What are the economic effects? What is being done legislatively/medically? Secondly, as I said in my review – make sure to make everything medically clear and add some more images. Most importantly, I think you should expand your intro section to cover everything that’s in the main body and to see if there are any other sections that would be helpful for you to add. Akweaver32 (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)