Talk:Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act

Untitled

This article is in horrible shape. It looks more like a discussion page than an actual, legitimate article. It needs major attention. RobertM525 09:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

It's a personal essay. I'm unsure if there's anything here worth keeping. — goethean ॐ 16:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps not, but it does seem like a topic worthy of an article as there appears to be some parallels between Jainism and Hinduism. Or at least that's what it seemed like from my World Civilization class last semester. :) RobertM525 19:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Moved

This article was at Jainism and Hinduism, but was moved here (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jainism and Hinduism). The resulting redirect was deleted. Proto::type 11:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Can we please have a link for the text of the bill?

Consequences?

What it leaves out is any mention of the consequences associated with being considered a "religious minority" rather than "part of Hinduism" within India. Is this just legislation over labels or are there practical, real world consequences to this designation? That should be mentioned in the article.75.133.90.126 (talk) 02:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gujarat Freedom of Religion Bill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?id=416861
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060503212818/http://voiceofdharma.com/books/wiah/ch7.htm to http://voiceofdharma.com/books/wiah/ch7.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gujarat Freedom of Religion Bill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070921031640/http://indianmuslims.in/gujarat-conversion-law-amendment-to-facilitate-jains/ to http://indianmuslims.in/gujarat-conversion-law-amendment-to-facilitate-jains/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)