This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I agree to merge proposal and article Guildford Molesworth should be merged with this page, as both is about same person.Jethwarp (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Currently, the 3rd sentence in the Career section has obviously been truncated. I hesitate to search the history for possible restitution, as this article is short enough that further research and expansion seems indicated. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195) 185.74.232.130 (talk) 14:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
The "offending" edit is here. It seems the sentence was re-written and the first words left in error. Eagleash (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
