Talk:Guide to the Perfect Latin American Idiot
Latest comment: 1 year ago by NoonIcarus in topic Liberalism
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article contains a translation of Manual del perfecto idiota latinoamericano from es.wikipedia. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Liberalism edit
This edit removed a part that clarified the intended meaning of the word "Liberal", as it uses the book itself as a reference, and that's a primary source. Yes, that's correct, but this is an acceptable use of primary sources: cite in an article about a book the things the book itself says. Cambalachero (talk) 23:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- The reference is the editor's notes in the English translation, and not from the original authors. While I can understand that it is important to distinguish the use of "liberalism" in English from progressism with classical liberalism, calling the book "libertarian" is a stretch, and I don't believe that this is the best way to support the claim. --NoonIcarus (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)