Talk:Guanabara (state)

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Geography of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Andrewa (talk) 04:48, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Guanabara (state) → Guanabara – Revert move which was done with invalid rationale "like Rio de Janeiro (state), Sao Paulo (state), Paraná (state), Acre (state)". Many incoming links are to this base name which now redirects to the pre-existing dab page, now a malplaced dab since the state was moved away from base name. The state appears to be the primary topic, and the article on the state should be moved back to the base name. PamD 14:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Oppose. No evidence provided that Guanabara state is the primary topic. If anything, I'd expect it to be Guanabara bay. There are few incoming links, easily fixable. Walrasiad (talk) 06:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oppose as per Walrasiad, no evidence that this is the primary topic. Tiggerjay (talk) 03:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic