Talk:Group Areas Act

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Group Areas Act article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa: Politics High‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the South African politics task force.

any improvements needed?Ř

Oh yes. Why is it that this article exists at all on Wikipedia? Because this law was a foundation of apartheid. Most/many other laws referred to it. It was a primary mechanism for establishing and retaining White privelege. So, to give the NP / (White) South African government's summary of the act, the Animal Farm "separate but equal" nonsense is POV! Shame! Paul Beardsell 18:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Group areas act edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What changed with the law put in place 41.216.204.48 (talk) 16:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic