 | A news item involving Gregg L. Semenza was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 9 October 2019. |  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evaluation edit
This article is incomplete but the information is correct. Its strengths are that it is factually correct and information is given at a neutral standpoint whereas, its weaknesses are that it does not have much information and is underdeveloped. Joseph Oldam (talk) 23:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Vandalism edit
This text was removed due to vandalism:
Semenza has been accused of frauds when several dozens of his articles have been found to contain duplicated results. Examples of fraud include copypastas of western blot results using a blur image manipulation tool.[1] Some of his now disputed papers includes the ones he received a nobel prize for.[2] Lelandykes (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Fredrik Jutfelt 🐠 (@FredrikJutfelt)". Nitter. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
- ^ "PubPeer - Search publications and join the conversation". pubpeer.com. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
Retractions edit
| User:Arifer sock Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Semenza has retracted 5 papers for image manipulation. While we cannot assert a pattern of deceit or misconduct, a story seems to be developing here. I initiated a new section in the article itself, motivated by an article appeared in Nature today October 21, 2022 (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03032-9). IneqsBell (talk) 18:05, 21 October 2022 (UTC) |