This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Wondering if the content of this article is forbidden. WP:SOAP Also, it doesn't seem to meet neutrality requirements. WP:NPOVRhadamanthys.Mann (talk) 23:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
What are you talking about, every party in this election listed their candidates, where is the neutrality issue? It's a factual list of the candidates, please clarify what the neutrality / soapbox issue is? Ottawakismet (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
There's no NPOV issue here. PKT(alk) 16:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
