Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Golden in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Golden (talk · contribs) 22:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'll be reviewing this article. — Golden call me maybe? 22:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed
  • Overall a solid article, but there are a few issues that need to be addressed:

Lead edit

  • Merge the first and second sentences of the lead.
  • Link Oslo in lead.

Background edit

  • No issues with this section. All sources were double-checked to ensure that they supported the information for which they were attributed.

Before Eurovision edit

  • Add a source for the Alpha TV Studio competition, as none of the three sources cited in the paragraph mention it.
  • Link Alpha TV in body.
  • Change "all" to "most" when describing newcomer artists in the competition; ESCToday describes the candidates as "..most of them newcomers in the country's music scene", while Eurovision TV writes "there are also some newcomers", indicating that not all of them were new artists.
  • Ref #18 does not support the sentence for which it is cited. Instead, it appears to be a source for the next sentence.
  • Ref #21 does not support the sentence for which it is cited. Thus, the two sentences preceding it (jury members and voting procedure) are unsourced. Include a source for these.

At Eurovision edit

  • No issues with the content or sourcing of this section.

Other comments edit

  • The titles of references #13 and #18 are "Archived Copy". I believe this is an error. — Golden call me maybe? 22:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Golden: Should be all set. Thank you! Grk1011 (talk) 20:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
All issues have been adequately addressed. Passing. Congratulations on yet another great article! — Golden call me maybe? 21:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply