Talk:Great Southern Bank

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Great Southern Bank is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This reads like an advert for CUA. I use CUA, and even I don't think they are that good! In fact, I have a deep suspicion that they are positioning themselves to turn into yet another dreadful Australian bank, exactly like St George did. Just my subjective cynicism, but this article strikes me as overly enthusiastic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.180.37 (talk) 13:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. When I get time I'll look at it. Apparently the page has been this way for a long time. Robert Brockway (talk) 00:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

NPOV edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have edited this page briefly to remove some of the advertising language. This article had previously used phrases best suited to CUA's website, and not to Wikipedia. Any further input in removing residual puffery is encouraged.Several ingredients (talk) 10:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic