Talk:Gramophone (magazine)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

The Gramophone edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why is this magazine called "The Gramophone" in en.wikipedia? It's name is pretty clearly "Gramophone": http://www.gramophone.co.uk/about.asp?sect=2 A look at the picture in the article (or their website address or whatever) would also do. - 62.134.213.186 14:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Criticism of Gramophone Magazine edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

One reason Gramophone has been criticized is a perceived pro-British bias by its reviewers. Sound from American labels has been frequently panned as "trans-Atlantic". This bias was highlighted when critic ~~Bryce Morrison~~ Jeremy Nicholas wrote a number of laudatory reviews of British pianist Joyce Hatto. The recordings turned out to be fakes, and Morrison had given negative reviews of the recordings when they had originally appeared (credited to the actual pianists).THD3 (talk) 18:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Founder edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

No mention of Sir Compton Mackenzie? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 22:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

He was namechecked in the intro. I added the length of his editorship -- didn't find a good source, I imagine his presence in that seat was taken for granted! Wire723 (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic