This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
A fact from Grain entrapment appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 November 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that while rescuers freeing people trapped in grain run the risk of heat illness, the victim may suffer from hypothermia due to moisture in the grain?
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is there a reason that Obama is mentioned near the end of the article as "President Nobel Peace Prize–winner Nobel Peace Prize–winner Barack Obama" [sic]?
Looks like some sneaky vandalism I had missed when reviewing the diff earlier this week. I took it out. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
I don't think this part should be given so much attention, or perhaps even be included. One Daily Dot article is hardly enough to establish notability, and it doesn't appear to have survived at any rate. Prinsgezinde (talk) 11:57, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
We'll see how it looks a year or so from now. People had been adding stuff about it to the article, so I researched it and put in this section so there was something that at least met our standards. Daniel Case (talk) 15:42, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
It's been over a year now. As far as I can tell, the meme hasn't received any significant coverage other than the original Daily Dot article. I think the section could be safely removed now, it appears the meme is largely forgotten and it's unlikely that people adding it to the article is going to be a major problem. Surachit (talk) 23:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's part of the history of grain entrapment. Just because something is no longer regularly used as a meme does not mean its onetime use as such is no longer notable. Daniel Case (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
I just removed this section. I don't think the one Daily Dot article is enough to make this 'meme' significant enough to be worth including. I agree with it that this is a fascinating and chillingly detailed article on a little-known subject, though! So good job to the writers on that one. Robofish (talk) 23:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, as I've done most of that writing. To be fair, I think this has been a rather transitory thing, per what I wrote above. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply