Talk:Graham Linehan
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Graham Linehan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting. |
Can you change "anti-transgender activist" to "women's rights activist"?
No. Wikipedia is primarily based on reliable secondary sources, and these describe Graham Linehan as an anti-transgender activist. Per discussions on the talk page, there is consensus among editors to use this wording. Please see the talk page archives to review these discussions. |
Change request to The Day Today in credits edit
The mention of The Day Today states that he was credited in 8 episodes - this cannot be possible, as there were only 6. Can this be changed or removed as appropriate? 2A00:23C4:E31:6801:A9C3:4633:B81D:CF65 (talk) 23:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have checked and he's credited in episodes 1 & 3, but not the other 4, two of which have no "additional material". He's credited as part of his writing partnership with Matthews. Rankersbo (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the edit - having just checked, there's a similar issue with Brass Eye, as there were only 7 episodes of that, so he couldn't be credited in 8 of them. 2A00:23C4:E31:6801:A9C3:4633:B81D:CF65 (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Credited on screen for all 6 of the series (Matthews and Baynham only other cowriters on every ep). Not credited on the 2001 special. Rankersbo (talk) 13:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Why is this page full of political bias? edit
It seems that this is a page that isn't written neutrally at all. Particularly in the light of the Cass review, the opinion in the UK has changed quite dramatically on this now. Can this not be revised to be neutral? Zaphriel (talk) 05:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide reliable sources EvergreenFir (talk) 05:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- There’s a million threads like this in the talk page archive, so checking to make sure they haven’t already covered what you’re suggesting is a good idea too. GraziePrego (talk) 05:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also, being very specific about what you think should be changed is also helpful. GraziePrego (talk) 05:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think there is a distinction between whether his position on trans rights is in the right area, and his behaviour in promoting his views. The page focusses on his actions and the consequences, not on whether the political position they come from is correct.
- To debate the Cass review and whether it endorses Grahams position (if not his behaviour) verges into WP:NOTFORUM Rankersbo (talk) 07:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes this often comes up. The article isn't great but changes are hard to achieve.
- Do remember that Wikipedia isn't about (anybodies) truth. It's just about what 'reliable sources ' say about a subject. That may be our limitation - but what better way is there? Lukewarmbeer (talk) 17:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- To debate the Cass review and whether it endorses Grahams position (if not his behaviour) verges into WP:NOTFORUM Rankersbo (talk) 07:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)