Talk:Gottfried Frölich
Latest comment: 7 years ago by AustralianRupert in topic Assessment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gottfried Frölich article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Assessment edit
For B-class, the article may need to cite additional sources. Right now, the page is single sourced to Mitcham. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- @K.e.coffman: G'day, I'm not sure you are right. For GA, definitely, however, the B class criteria really only require everything to be cited (which is higher than other project's B-class, mind). Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/B-Class FAQ also appears silent on this. Of course, though, multiple different sources is ideal, but currently is not listed specifically as a criterion for B class. If you wish to add this requirement I believe it would be broadly supported - I would support it, at least - but we do need to be careful of assessment creep as Milhist B class is already higher than many other projects, which has caused some confusion (and angst for new editors) in the past. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)