| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Goosebumps Series 2000 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
You know, the earlier goosebumps books where just cheesy and harmless horror stories. But I think the 2000 series was much more trying to reach to the 16-18 demographic, as some of it was rather adult ("balls-to-the-wall", one might say). Does anyone think this is worth mentioning? - Another n00b (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Only if you can find a comment to that effect from a reliable source, otherwise it counts as original research. DS (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Can each of the books receive its own article? If they aren't considered notable enough, what can I do to make them notable?`20:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)2602:306:C541:CC60:E142:4F85:E60C:1047 (talk)
- They need to meet the notability criteria for books. If we were to create articles on all the books, they would consist mainly of a plot summary. That would be unnecessary, considering this article already contains a plot summary of all the books. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 17:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)