Talk:Gooey (software)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by PamD in topic Comment from 2006

Comment from 2006 edit

moved from the article page Kappa 12:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
This content had been added to the article by an IP editor on 20 February 2006. PamD 16:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

For many people Gooey was a perfect amalgam of many different chat programs. I started using gooey in jan 2000 but i had many friends who were using it several years before that. many long time friendships started in gooey and i am aware of a number of marriages that occured between people who first got to know each other as they shared comments and opinions etc on gooey sites.

There are 2 community online groups running today that i'm aware of where gooey people are still remembered fondly.

One is the gooey community users group on msn http://groups.msn.com/Gooeyuserscommunity/_homepage.msnw?pgmarket=en-us

the other is www.chat-alot.com which was created intially for gooeyers who met at the main gooey site to be able to still get together once gooey died.

I notice this article says gooey was closed down in 2000 but if you had the program already and were registered it still ran provided you did not change ip's. It ran until dec/jan 2000-2001 there were several versions of gooey by early 2000 and i think it depended on which version you were using as to when you stopped being able to get it to run.. Anybody I still talk to who used the program remembers it fondly. We all wish it was still around.

Kex

Gooey bought out by CNET? edit

I find this funny, because if you use the Wayback Machine and look at CNET's homepage, it says Gooey is Internet software of the year 2006 and on Wikipedia it says CNET bought out Gooey...--4.244.33.29 (talk) 23:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gooey lives on! edit

You can still add Gooey to your site and forums using the Wayback Machine, I have already gotten several InvisionFree admins to add Gooey to their sites, spread the word by suggesting it to them via their suggestions forum.--4.244.33.29 (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1010086/000100547700004562/0001005477-00-004562-0001.txt. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply