Talk:Goodspeed Musicals

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York Times Article: Should Goodspeed Stay, or Should It Go? edit

Good article (from 29 Feb 2004) discussing history of Goodspeed Musicals and discussion about problems with current site and possible relocation to Middletown CT.

This article is a great source for this article: Should Goodspeed Stay, or Should It Go?

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'd really like to add to this article, seeing as how I grew up in East Haddam and played at the Goodspeed, but I'm not sure what I can add. I do know that Goodspeed has allowed East Haddam's high school concert band to play on its stage at least twice, but I don't know if that's noticable. Suggestions? --Niroht | Smoke signals 03:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article does read kinda brochure/advert-ey. Making it more NPOV would help, as well as more details (appropriately cited, of course) about it's history. Sounds like a neat place, and it'd be great if there was more info in the article. --Ebyabe 00:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Previous article edit

There used to be a much longer article on this topic which has somehow disappeared. Is it possible to see what happened to the much more detailed article? It predated the earliest edit listed.

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goodspeed Musicals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714194527/http://www.ctvisit.com/tours/goodspeed-opera-house-tour/summary/2236 to http://www.ctvisit.com/tours/goodspeed-opera-house-tour/summary/2236

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic