Talk:Gong Cha

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Thidalis.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Gong Cha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121127142502/http://www.gong-cha.com/en/alliance.php to http://www.gong-cha.com/en/alliance.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141016013126/http://www.gong-cha.com/location.php?cat_id=16 to http://www.gong-cha.com/location.php?cat_id=16
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130205001653/http://www.gong-cha.com/en/prod.php to http://www.gong-cha.com/en/prod.php
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://news.sina.com.hk/news/20110602/-1-2345341/1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150412174851/http://www.gong-cha.com/news.php?act=view&no=130 to http://www.gong-cha.com/news.php?act=view&no=130
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150412192228/http://www.gong-cha.com/news.php?act=view&no=131 to http://www.gong-cha.com/news.php?act=view&no=131
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150614010240/http://www.gong-cha.com/news.php?act=view&no=132 to http://www.gong-cha.com/news.php?act=view&no=132
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150614010556/http://www.gong-cha.com/news.php?act=view&no=133 to http://www.gong-cha.com/news.php?act=view&no=133

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

What is the reason for deleting the contents about the origin of the company in the heading summary?

could someone who made the deletion give a proper explanation of deliberately erasing the origin country about this company? Even the article has given plenty of sources to verify that points. 123.195.130.73 (talk) 08:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Is Facebook considered an Irish company? 124.210.205.66 (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

your example gave no sense, even in the historic section of Facebook mentioned it was emerged from a Harvard University network... what are you trying to prove??

every company has stated their first country of origin in the summary whereas their ownership was tranferred in whose hand 123.195.130.73 (talk) 09:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

For the sake of good faith, I'd give my take. An identical example would be Grab. It was founded in Malaysia, but moved its HQ to Singapore later on (along with the owner), and obviously no one considers it a Malaysian company. Gong Cha was sold off years ago to a South Korean company/owner, so the truth is it is actually more in line as a Korean company than a Taiwanese company. Do you want it to say it's South Korean? Because if not, the current version is actually the most "neutral" solution, as it stood before you came in and started hounding my edits. TwoChaGong (talk) 09:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

For instance, Seven-Eleven was owned 70 % of stock share by the Japanese affiliate Ito-Yokado, but the main article is still clearly stated it was from Dallas, the United States. As is the case to be applied to Gong cha 123.195.130.73 (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Seven-Eleven is owned by Seven & I Holdings, and it very much says that its Japanese. This article is not supposed to take the place of a subsidiary, as there aren't two articles for Gong Cha. It also isn't even a proper comparison, as 70% and being sold off entirely is a world of a difference. TwoChaGong (talk) 09:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Is Gong Cha owned by its Korean branch for 100 percent share? You can check again before telling me it's different story.

And by your accusation of "hounding my edits". Is not you the one who started to hounding my historical edits in the first place such as Developed country, Kingdom of Tungning and Taiwan passport etc. what's the position for you to make such an accusation? 123.195.130.73 (talk) 09:32, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Details

Um may I know how many stuff the whole outlet here In Singapore are needed 103.196.112.19 (talk) 06:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Gong Cha logo 20130427.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)