Talk:Gone for Goode

Gone for Goode has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Gone for Goode is part of the Homicide: Life on the Street (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 20, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
April 13, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
April 20, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 4, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the executive director of Homicide: Life on the Street said Richard Belzer was a "lousy actor" when he first auditioned for the role of John Munch in the pilot episode "Gone for Goode"?
Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gone for Goode/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria edit

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
A scene involving a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body while investigating the Church case mirrored a similar situation described in Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets from the Parrish case "a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body"? Do we mean an undertaker or a funeral director here? Done

I made a number of minor copy-edits for clarity.[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources. I assume good faith for all off-line sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Thorough, but not over detailed.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Two images used, bot correctly tagged and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

If you can just fix the exhumation bit above, I will be happy to pass this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Good, all is in order, I am happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, that should have read "funeral director", not funeral. I've fixed it. Thanks for the review! — Hun ter Ka hn 20:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic