Talk:Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film

Awards Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Film: Awards / Soviet and post-Soviet

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.
	This article is supported by the Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force.

Russia: Performing arts Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the performing arts in Russia task force.

Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 10, 2011	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
August 11, 2012	Featured list candidate	Promoted
April 3, 2017	Featured list removal candidate	Demoted

Current status: Former featured list

Errors edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion

Reference 3 is a nomination. Not the award. Wrong link. Try ref 6. Ref 4 is wrong. It's a nomination page, the King's speech is not even noted on that page. Try ref 49.

Though the problem is that in what little non-list material we have, " It is one of the Golden Eagle Awards, which were conceived by Nikita Mikhalkov as a counterweight to the Nika Award established in 1987 by the Russian Academy of Cinema Arts and Sciences.[1][2]" The first source does not cover the content. The page states, "He also set the Russian Academy Golden Eagle Award in opposition to the traditional Nika Award." Not the Golden Eagle Awards themselves were created by Nikita Mikhalkov as a counterweight to the Nika Award. The second source covers the "established in 1987 by the Russian Academy of Cinema Arts and Sciences" last part adequately.

The prose needs to be fixed, either way it doesn't state Nikita even created it, just that he 'set it' as in this award, not that he created the Golden Eagle Awards. Not sure how this managed escape scrutiny of the reviewers.

I fixed the references and removed the earlier issue until it can be rectified. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

The refs currently used (as of this edit) support the problem sentence. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:53, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ref 9 includes the nominations, but also noted the winner (see statue after cover), and the titles are in Russian. Replaced that ref, though it also mentioned King's Speech, but in Russian.
Conceived, not created.--Tomcat (7) 16:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Conceived implies that he is responsible for its creation. That's the problem. ' To begin or originate in a specific way' and that is the only one which could apply and that is the least used definition. Unless you replace it with 'thought about' in which case that version of conceived is probably fine, but terribly worded. Either way. Let's cut the extra bit about the Nika award, because it could confuse readers into thinking that the Golden Eagle award started in 1987 instead. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contextualisation is important, but it needs to be well phrased. I'd keep some for of contextualisation. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:42, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Then split the context of the Nika award to its own sentence? I worry about confusion of the readers. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Something like this — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, that looks much better. That way it isn't confusing it is remains faithful to the source material. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:53, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wow, you removed a whole text and sources just because of a single word with which you disagree? That is clearly disruptive editing. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 11:54, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

'A whole text'? Try one sentence. Material can be removed temporarily while a fix is undergone, FA articles are held to a higher standard, and that is why I didn't remove the material at Eckfelder while the fixes are requested. It is not disruptive and it was not a key or large portion of the article. I'll make the same changes to the other Golden Eagle page as that is a much better wording. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:53, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film (Russia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 24 external links on Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film (Russia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film (Russia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928083203/http://www.kinoacademy.ru/nomination2009 to http://www.kinoacademy.ru/nomination2009

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic