Talk:Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png)
.jpg){kind=small}
Final sentence of lead edit
Hello all. Darrenhusted has a problem with the last sentence of the lead (Critics generally regarded "Going, Going, Gone" as disconsolate.). He doesn't seem to understand that it's perfectly acceptable to summarize how critics felt about a television episode. Using an actual adjective written by critics is unnecessary and somewhat redundant. FA's and other quality articles often say things such as "the episode was negatively received" or "the episode was positively received" to sum up the episode. This one was looked upon as sad by critics, so it is summarized as such. You obviously don't need to cite a summary of the critical reviews. The evidence is in the Critical reviews section, where almost every critic acknowledged the episode as sad. "Sad" is not a strong enough term, as judged in the FAC, so the synonym 'disconsolate' is more appropriate. Opinions? Also, Darrenhusted, leave the article as is, because when something is under discussion, the article remains as is until you can get consensus for your change. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- The 'critical response' section makes it clear that critics have described the episode as "sad", although a source may be required for clarification if some are questioning it. However, there is a pretty clear convention for the placement of references, typically only applied in an article's body for valid reasons. I'll remain neutral for now. TBrandley (T • C • B) 23:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
None of the critics use the word 'disconsolate', and while that might sum up the opinions of the critics concerned (in the same way that bad reviews may be called bad, or mixed reviews maybe called mixed) no one critic uses that word, not does it adequately reflect the opinions of the critics as to the quality of the episode (which is usually what is summed up by critics of films and television). And while ledes can be reference free if any user asks for references then quoting policy isn't enough to justify a summation by a user in lieu of a reference. If you want a policy then how about OWN? TRLIJC19, you don't own the article. In the lede it would be more appropriate to say that critics praised the episode or found it to be a terrible episode rather than attempt to (in your own words) sum up the mood. If you want to choose some of the words used by the critics and tag each with a reference (which would be the same used later in the article) then I would be fine with that; what doesn't seem correct is summing up in your own words and not using any reference. I removed it rather than tag it with a CN because the rest of the article is fine, that one sentence needs looking at. Darrenhusted (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121004234018/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com:80/2012/10/02/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-sunday-night-football-tops-week-1-viewing-among-adults-18-49-and-with-total-viewers/151011/? to http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/10/02/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-sunday-night-football-tops-week-1-viewing-among-adults-18-49-and-with-total-viewers/151011/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120930235534/http://www.tvguide.com:80/tvshows/greys-anatomy/episode-1-season-9/191535 to http://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/greys-anatomy/episode-1-season-9/191535
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.hollywood.com/content/news_detail.aspx?id=41129749&p=1 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002034239/http://au.ibtimes.com:80/articles/388964/20120928/greys-anatomy-season-9-premiere-recap.htm to http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/388964/20120928/greys-anatomy-season-9-premiere-recap.htm#.UGe_VEIxXCD
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120930002956/http://www.afterellen.com:80/content/2012/09/greys-anatomy-recap-going-going-gone-91 to http://www.afterellen.com/content/2012/09/greys-anatomy-recap-going-going-gone-91
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/10/02/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-sunday-night-football-tops-week-1-viewing-among-adults-18-49-and-with-total-viewers/151011/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019080212/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/10/14/live7-dvr-ratings-revolution-leads-absolute-gains-grimm-leads-percentage-gains-in-premiere-week-week-1/152888/ to http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/10/14/live7-dvr-ratings-revolution-leads-absolute-gains-grimm-leads-percentage-gains-in-premiere-week-week-1/152888/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/greys-anatomy/episode-1-season-9/191535
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/388964/20120928/greys-anatomy-season-9-premiere-recap.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afterellen.com/content/2012/09/greys-anatomy-recap-going-going-gone-91
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Going, Going, Gone (Grey's Anatomy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120930190719/http://abc.go.com/shows/greys-anatomy/episode-detail/going-going-gone/1017496 to http://abc.go.com/shows/greys-anatomy/episode-detail/going-going-gone/1017496
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)