Talk:Global Communication
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Linking with abandon edit
This is the reddest article I've seen in forever. If I'm not mistaken it's against general policy and counter intuitive. It makes for very messy reading and has to do with subjects that may never warrant any other page besides this one, considering some are merely alternate names for those involved in Global Communication, presumably the most notable output. Someone or myself should unlink most of this if it's agreeable. Links can serve as suggestions for warranted articles, but this is silly. Pixel Eater (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Links establishing notability edit
Since someone didn't think Global Communication was notable: http://www.theguardian.com/music/2005/sep/16/popandrock.shopping1 http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/review/global-communication-7614 http://www.factmag.com/2012/06/23/global-communication-metamorphosis/ They are a big name in 1990s ambient music. Samboy (talk) 19:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)