Talk:Glad You Came

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Glad You Came

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Glad You Came. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Glad You Came. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Glad You Came edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Glad You Came's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "bpi":

  • From Glee (season 1): "BPI > Certified Awards Search". British Phonographic Industry. Archived from the original on January 11, 2013. Retrieved April 23, 2010.
  • From The Wanted discography: "British certifications – Wanted". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved 30 July 2022. Type Wanted in the "Search BPI Awards" field and then press Enter.
  • From Glee singles discography: "Certified Awards" (enter "Glee" into the "Keywords" box, then select "Search"). British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved March 23, 2019.
  • From ZieZie: "British certifications – ZieZie". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved 13 March 2022. Type ZieZie in the "Search BPI Awards" field and then press Enter.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 21:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply