Talk:Giveamanakick/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Candlewicke in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 04:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Conclusion

This a very good article. I only have two items. First, I think the "noise rock" quote in the lead belongs in the "Styles" section, or at least a mentioning of "noise rock" or "punk rock" in that section. Second, did they give no reason for their split? --maclean (talk) 05:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. (1) Done. (2) I have no idea or at least not one that has a reliable source. --candlewicke 21:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply