 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
How to keep the version current? edit
The version listed is not the latest version and misses a number of security updates. My attempt to add the current version to the list results in an error on this page, but I don't know how to correct it. On the other hand, I don't think people should be misled to install an insecure version. 2A02:C7F:F6F4:4200:DAE5:9BC:AD9A:C64D (talk) 23:20, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- I fixed it, it was an issue with things being labelled "preferred". Unbeatable101 (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Forgejo Section edit
The section Forgejo fork is currently being frequently editing in and out of the page. Should Forgejo be included within this page, or should it not? Steve0Greatness (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Until we have come to consensus, this section probably should not be removed from the body of this article. Steve0Greatness (talk) 00:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
The latest revision is biased towards the project.Considering to remake the section into an article We should invite people to discuss here before editing. Ahri.boy (talk) 11:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)- Update: Protected due to edit warring Ahri.boy (talk) 05:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- What's the next? When will you remove the advertisment content? I think I have posted enough evidences and references here. You can find more information from the projects Github and blog. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea & https://blog.gitea.com . If somebody forked wikipedia, should that be put into the wikipedia page in the wikipedia site? 103.152.112.176 (talk) 03:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @103.152.112.176 then, I'd consider tag the section. Ahri.boy (talk) 03:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you to do the tag. What's the next should we do to remove the advertisement? 5.34.216.37 (talk) 05:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- @103.152.112.176 then, I'd consider tag the section. Ahri.boy (talk) 03:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- What's the next? When will you remove the advertisment content? I think I have posted enough evidences and references here. You can find more information from the projects Github and blog. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea & https://blog.gitea.com . If somebody forked wikipedia, should that be put into the wikipedia page in the wikipedia site? 103.152.112.176 (talk) 03:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Update: Protected due to edit warring Ahri.boy (talk) 05:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- As a famous open source project, the project have many fork projects. I don't think puting a fork here have any good reason. It looks like an advertisement. The Gitea community still have over 50+ maintainers and yearly election even if the company involved. You can find the information here https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#technical-oversight-committee-toc. And Gitea nowadays becomes more actively than before even there are many forks. So please stop adding advertisement in Gitea's page. The correct operation is creating a new page for your fork and announcement it forked from Gitea in that page. Should we put hundreds of Gitea forks in Gitea page? 199.230.105.54 (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)