Merger proposal edit

I am nominating that these articles be merged with the Gettysburg Battlefield article, since they describe minor portions of the battlefield and from what I've read these places were not vital for either army to possess in order to win the battle. Wild Wolf (talk) 22:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't have and object to merging in most of Barlow Knoll, but the parts about being a populated place probably need to be left as a stub and hopefully expanded. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
It has been nearly two weeks and no one has objected to this proposal. I will therefore assume that the merge will be ok. Wild Wolf (talk) 19:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal with Baltimore Hill edit

I am nominating that the Baltimore Hill article be merged with the Gettysburg Battlefield article, since it describes a minor portion of the battlefield and from what I've read this place was not vital for either army to possess in order to win the battle. Wild Wolf (talk) 15:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Third merger proposal edit

I have proposed that these articles be merged here because this seems like a case of inherited notablility. Wild Wolf (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gettysburg Battlefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Samuel W. Crawford? edit

The wiki page for General Samuel W. Crawford says ‘After the war, Crawford was prominent in preserving the Gettysburg Battlefield’. There is no mention of Crawford in the quite extensive attributions to other personnel in this context. Valetude (talk) 12:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ziegler's or Zeigler's? edit

Isn't "Ziegler" the correct spelling as opposed to "Zeigler"used in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OG a.D. 86 (talkcontribs) 09:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gettysburg Battlefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Gettysburg National Battlefield" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gettysburg National Battlefield. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 2#Gettysburg National Battlefield until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply