Talk:German torpedo boat T24

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Zawed in topic GA Review


GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:German torpedo boat T24/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 23:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 23:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC) This looks in good shape. My comments:Reply

  • "On 3 July T24 and her sister T25 departed for Western France." The following sentence mentions British coastal artillery, so for better context, I think it should be mentioned they were (presumably) going via the English Channel.
    • It's mentioned in the lede.
      • But the lede is supposed to be a summary of the body of the article, and it is not mentioned in the body. Zawed (talk) 08:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
        • Added, but I'd have thought that the mentions of French ports on the Channel visited en route would have informed the reader that they weren't taking the long route past Scotland.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • "through the Bay."; specify Bay of Biscay here, it is the first time it is mentioned.
    • See above
  • "threw spray over their forward guns that made them difficult to operate."; replace that with and
    • I think "which" works even better
  • "Korvettenkapitän Franz Kohlauf"; presumably commander of 4th Flotilla. If so, mention this.
  • "The German ships had been spotted first..."; This starts off quite a long sentence, consider breaking it up.
    • I've separated the bit covering T24's inaction with a semi-colon
  • "37 mm anti-aircraft guns"; shouldn't this be 3.7 cm for consistency with the armament of the T24 (I assume; the way this sentence is structured suggests you are referring to the exchange of fire so the 40mm is British).
  • Referring to the citations, it looks like you use the year of pub to differentiate between the two Whitley refs - but there are some that don't have the year.
    • Good catch
  • No dupe links
  • No dab links
  • External links check out OK
  • Image tags look fine

That's my comments complete. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 06:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

    • Thanks for the thorough review. Let me know if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
      • @Zawed: just checking you haven't forgot about this. L293D ( • ) 00:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
        • Looking good, I've queried one point though. Zawed (talk) 08:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
          • OK, passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply