Talk:Gerda Ring
 | A fact from Gerda Ring appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 September 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Affair with Wilhelm Reich edit
Ring had an affair with Wilhelm Reich when his relationship with Elsa Lindenberg soured during the 1937-38 media attacks against him, and only with the help of Sigurd Hoel did this not become publicly known at the time. I've added a bit about this to the Reich article, but I would like others' opinion about whether it should also be included in the present article. __meco (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gerda Ring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091227022904/http://mediabase1.uib.no:80/krigslex/r/r3.html to http://mediabase1.uib.no/krigslex/r/r3.html#ring-gerda
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130529163303/https://mediabase1.uib.no:80/krigslex/t/t1.html to http://mediabase1.uib.no/krigslex/t/t1.html#teaterstreiken
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)