Talk:Geobiology (pseudoscience)
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Steelpillow in topic Title
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geobiology (pseudoscience) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Title edit
The title is ridiculous ; if geobiology is a << field of scientific research >>, how is it a pseudoscience ? Regards Michel421 (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. This article offers no evidence that the dowsing/radiesthesia/electromagnetic hypersensitivity aspect of geobiology is a distinct field of study, and not just bad/pseudo scientists imagining they are doing good geobiology. Setting up a "straw man" article solely for the purpose of shooting down the topic is not encyclopedic. I'd suggest that it be broken up and merged back into those various articles and then deleted. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 07:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)