Talk:Gauche Socialiste

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Chajusong in topic Notability

Untitled edit

Should I mention that they are 4 people? :P Trotskyistmaniac (talk) 23:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gauche Socialiste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notability edit

I don't think this article meets standards for notability. It's not even clear to me that this is a notable enough group to be merged into Québec solidaire's main article.

No reliable sources mentioning the group are cited in the article, and some of the links go to pages that don't mention this faction at all. The link that does is of dubious reliability - socialisthistory.ca .

A quick google only brings up one mention of this faction in mainstream media: an opinion column in La Presse that merely mentions the name and *cites Wikipedia* as evidence of its existence. Barring evidence that this is a notable group, I'm inclined to think this article should be deleted. Chajusong (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply