Talk:Gasherbrum

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gasherbrum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Geology

	Geology portal Talk:Gasherbrum is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mountains High‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History section edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

i'd like to make a correction here, but as far as i can tell, it's an "original research" dilemma.

"Broad Peak was thought to miss out on a K-number as it was hidden from Montgomerie's view by the Gasherbrum group."

this statement is uncited, which is just as well, because it can't be true ;) according to multiple other articles on wiki, Montgomerie identified these peaks from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmukh. if this is indeed the case, then broad peak was NOT obscured from his vision by the gasherbrum group, but rather it was hidden behind Masherbrum. do i simply replace one uncited assertion with another? how do i fix this? Ed WoodWiki (talk) 03:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

i went ahead with it :) Ed WoodWiki (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic