Talk:Garsdale

CCHT external link

This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garsdale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141205102055/http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/viewFullDataset.do?instanceSelection=03070&productId=779&$ph=60_61&datasetInstanceId=3070&startColumn=1&numberOfColumns=8&containerAreaId=790350 to http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/viewFullDataset.do?instanceSelection=03070&productId=779&$ph=60_61&datasetInstanceId=3070&startColumn=1&numberOfColumns=8&containerAreaId=790350

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

27 March 2021 edit

Dave.Dunford - removal of historical county stuff, no problem with, but why remove the WP:SHORTDESC, dmy, and adding bad parameters into the sources (coauthors). Could you revisit this, please? I don't want to blanket reverse as the historical county bit is not contentious. Thanks and regards. The joy of all things (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

My bad. I was tidying up after an editor who'd made multiple historical county changes, and messed this one up. Dave.Dunford (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Ta, but you don't have revert all of it. The original intent was fine. The joy of all things (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)