Talk:Garrett Geros

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Chrisvls in topic Sanctions

Sanctions

edit

The sanctions information in this edit appear to only have primary sources, which is problematic per Wikipedia:BLPPRIMARY. This was pointed out to me by @ToBeFree. Pinging @FenrisAureus @Materialscientist @Skywatcher68 @021789et @75.70.76.150

I understand 75.70.76.150's argument that the case is under appeal. I'm not use that wins the day, especially if the status is described as such. And while it leaves us in a bit of an unusual state, I see ToBeFree's point about the sourcing. Chris vLS (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

AgreeFenrisAureus (she/they) (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I was previously unaware of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. — FenrisAureus (she/they) (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
WP:BLPPRIMARY is certainly a better rationale than what the IPs have been using.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
True that. Chris vLS (talk) 00:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply