This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
All we know is that he ...became involved in various other businesses including railroads, shipping and manufacturing.
I think we need a bit more detail to justify his category of 'American civil war industrialist'. Valetude (talk) 16:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Colby, Wisconsin, named for Gardner's son Charlesedit
According to Roy L. Martin History of the Wisconsin Central (Bulletin No. 54, The Railroad and Locomotive Historical Society, 1941) Colby, Wisconsin, was named for Gardner Colby's son Charles. Martin's book is semi-authoritative. It has some errors, and has no citations, but generally speaking it conforms and is verifiable by other sources. In this case he is likely correct. See page 28 of that book.
