Talk:Gardeners' Question Time

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Geoffrey Smith edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

RE 1994 - Geoffrey Smith stayed on as did one or two other occasional guests — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.107.65 (talk) 20:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Controversy - 2014 accusation of racism edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

There seems to be an upheaval about whether the programme is -racist or, -unintentionally uses common panels that can be related to racist stereotypes in the general public or, -is a proper gardening discussion pointed at by self proclaimed purificators with a nonsense accusation or, -is this just a desperate attempt to get more publicity by/for one of the involved parties?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/gardening/11012398/Is-Gardeners-Question-Time-racist.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2716106/Gardeners-Question-Time-caught-race-row.html http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/18713/ http://www.dailystormer.com/racist-gardeners-on-radio-4-send-out-coded-messages-to-turn-listeners-into-nazis/

It would be nice if someone had the time and expertise to deal with this question and perhaps not just mention the controversy arised but, even solve it. 94.69.235.17 (talk) 13:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just more chest-beating and righteous indignation from the Daily Hate. The academic, Ben Pitcher, responded in The Guardian here, and said: "This week, a passing reference to Gardeners' Question Time in an interview about my new book on BBC Radio 4, landed me at the centre of controversy. According to the Daily Mail, which broke the story on this supposed "race row", I accused Gardeners' Question Time of "spreading covert racist stereotypes". The story was jumped upon and repeated as perfect silly season material: some lefty academic trying to close down a venerable national institution, wasting taxpayers’ money and preventing decent British people from calling a spade a spade out of obedience to a right-on, politically correct agenda. For the record, I don’t think that GQT is racist, and the story is based on a deliberate misconstrual of what I have said and written." Per his response, and per WP:RECENTISM I don't think it belongs in the article at the moment. Keri (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the additional information! (And thank you for the welcome, though at the moment I don't feel confident enough to sign up as an editor; as a non-native I mostly confine myself to adding a short comment on the talk-pages, rather than edit with the rare exception for occasional typos, or a missing link, or sg similar. I have a dynamic IP, so it might change daily, or so, but I received the message, and appreciated it.)

94.69.235.17 (talk) 20:48, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic