Talk:Game Composites GB1 GameBird
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ahunt in topic British, or U.S.?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Game Composites GB1 GameBird article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
British, or U.S.? edit
Game Composites lists their location as Bentonville, AR, USA (see their website). I remember reading an article (AOPA Flight magazine) where the location came before the flight testing, so I think the GB1 should list national origin as "United States".
NOTE: EASA is supposedly easier than the FAA to work with for certification, hence the reason EASA certification happened first. That was also described as a business decision in the above referenced AOPA article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.35.209.251 (talk) 05:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)