Talk:GQ Thailand

Copyright

I've removed copy/paste text from the article as a copyright violation. Regardless of whether it was from inpublishing, Conde Nast, or wherever, it was not published under a free license, so you can't just paste it into the article. If you want to include that information, then just re-write it in your own words rather than copying someone else's. Crow^Caw 15:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.inpublishing.co.uk/news/articles/gq_thailand_launches_7879.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Magazine cover

The magazine cover image should not be rotated to keep the current edition's cover shown. That is not a valid Fair Use. Having issue #1's cover is easier to justify, especially since it was analysed in the article. (No, that is not an invitation to describe every cover). Note that other magazine articles, (Rolling Stone, Time Magazine) don't have any cover in their infobox, and the parent of this magazine, GQ has one from 2007. I'm trying to work with you to keep this compliant; I don't want to remove anything more than is required by policy, so please work with me. Thanks. Crow^Caw 21:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GQ Thailand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140907100207/http://www.ppa.co.uk/news/industry/2014/08/gq-launches-in-thailand/ to http://www.ppa.co.uk/news/industry/2014/08/gq-launches-in-thailand/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)