Talk:GGP Inc.

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 2 December 2019

References edit

It would be important to obtain third-party references rather than trusting the company's web site. Pascal.Tesson 17:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on General Growth Properties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Growth Properties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

General Growth Properties name change edit

Hi, I understand that Wikipedia discourages an employee updating information on their company Wiki page, so I wanted to bring this up here. I also want to note that I have never edited through Wikipedia in the past, so I'm sorry if this is a dumb question.

Last week, General Growth Properties went through a name change to GGP [1]. With that update, we'd like all references to be updated to show that change. Would you please advise on the best way to get this implemented on our Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Growth_Properties

Thanks, GGPSocial (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

We already have a page called GGP so not so straightforward as a page move, and please read WP:COMMONNAME. Theroadislong (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Theroadislong, what about if we move it to "GGP Inc." since that's officially our legal name we're moving to. GGPSocial (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GGP Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Rouse Properties edit

Source page is basically a directory listing (which goes against WP:! with a short corporate history that could be (and has been?) merged Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Support, I don't see anything in the Rouse article that can't be adequately addressed as a section in this article. WikiRedactor (talk) 03:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 2 December 2019 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: move the page to GGP Inc. in preparation for other editorial changes, as discussed below. Dekimasuよ! 05:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


Brookfield Properties Retail GroupGGP Inc. – The article has become highly confusing after the acquisition by Brookfield; I believe the simplest ways to solve this problem are to:

  • Move "Brookfield Properties Retail Group" back to "GGP Inc.", since the content of the article is really the history of GGP (a noteworthy company in its own right) before Brookfield.
  • Take any post-Brookfield information and merge it into the Brookfield Properties article and redirect the "Brookfield Properties Retail Group" namespace to that article. A previous discussion noted that it is incorrect to speak of "Brookfield Properties Retail Group" as a separate division, since it is a unit within the existing Brookfield Properties division of Brookfield Asset Management ("Brookfield Properties' retail group", as it is described by the company).
  • Split the existing list of properties into its own namespace, ensuring that the GGP Inc. article stays true to the pre-Brookfield history and the Brookfield Properties article does not become bloated. WikiRedactor (talk) 02:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC) Relisting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Support (COI) As a disclosed Brookfield employee, I proposed a version of this idea at Talk:Brookfield Properties#Merger proposal, and I think WikiRedactor's solution here is completely reasonable. Thanks! Dvruthven (talk) 15:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • WikiRedactor, I am willing to close this as a move, but this is probably still open after 4 weeks despite the lack of objections because of the amount of work implied (WP:DEMAND). If I move the page and close the discussion, will you perform the necessary splits and merges? Dekimasuよ! 07:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.