Talk:Frictional Games
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_%22BIG_GOMEZ%22.svg)
Delete it edit
I am not sure about this entry!!! It is about some obscure Swedish company that apparently makes video games--BIG DEAL!! Let's delete this entry! The internets will be better off! 24.14.33.171 (talk) 20:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Unbirth edit
They made another game, info here: [1]--Samusaran253 (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Fiend, too: http://frictionalgames.com/site/fiend/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.117.144 (talk) 03:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
This game company isn't obscure edit
It sure isn't, it got most popular when they developed amnesia the dark descent, i've seen lots of positive reactions about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.27.80.28 (talk) 10:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Possibly wrong statement, if someone is bored might be worth fact checking and removing/correcting edit
"The series was financially successful but suffered from several issues that Frictional held Paradox Interactive responsible for." > I've read the cite ref for this, and this just doesn't seem to hold up based on the reference. in the cited interview, they almost purely complain about lexicon entertainment, as well as just the nature of the chaos of a publisher switch mid-trilogy, but not that paradox (the post-switch publisher) in any way impact the series unlike all the actions by the previous publisher (lexicon). so is there an actual source for this claim specifically about paradox, or is it just incorrect? if anyone has a proper source please add it, or otherwise maybe someone reading this will be motivated to fix it e.g. by changing paradox to lexicon, or removing this sentence entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:ea:7f12:f000:7c6a:fcff:fe17:f07a (talk) 09:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)