Talk:Freeman-Walter-Abele Test
Latest comment: 8 years ago by PraeceptorIP in topic Much earlier obsolete
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
Untitled edit
This article needs some polishing. As well is there a good template for CAFC cases? Shadesofgrey (talk) 02:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Much earlier obsolete edit
The text says that the FWA test was dead at the time of the CAFC Bilski decision (October 2008). Afaik the FWA test became less and less influential from the very moment it was established, in the early 1980s. In 1990 the influence was still only minimal, and the moment of abolishment is IMHO definitly not later than the 1998 State Street Bank decision, that adopted the "useful, concrete & tangible" test. Rbakels (talk) 23:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Updated now. PraeceptorIP (talk) 01:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)