Talk:Fred Teeven
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fred Teeven article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Errors in article edit
"""Had Teeven just informed the Tax department, they would most likely have been able to seize all the money and issue a fine. Rather than making a criminal poorer, Teeven made him richer""" 1. All is under investigation, so conclusions and would-have-beens are speculative 2. 'would most likely have been able to...' is a complete guess without sourcing 3. 'Rather than making a criminal poorer, Teeven made him richer' is irrelevant smear.
For now I'll just note this, but won't edit this article. Hopefully another more objective Wikipedian can restore this article to before these statements were added. Just to be clear: I have no qualms with the article listing facts about the money laundry case. I do have qualms with this POV, inaccurate, speculative, original research and I don't even know how to describe 3.
One could look at the Dutch article ( http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Teeven ) for up-to-date references, like: http://www.parlement.com/id/vjsjf0h58qve/nieuws/fred_teeven_keert_terug_in_de_tweede — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.173.239.112 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)