Talk:Frank Bladin

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ian Rose in topic Sandwiching?
Featured articleFrank Bladin is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 26, 2023.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 15, 2009Good article nomineeListed
May 20, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
September 20, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 18, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Air Vice Marshal Frank Bladin (pictured) was nicknamed "Dad" for the concern he showed for the welfare of his personnel?
Current status: Featured article

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Bladin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Frank Bladin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Frank Bladin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sandwiching? edit

@Ian Rose: what do you mean by "avoid sandwiching"? The current version looks quite ugly on my computer. (looks quite bad on an iPad Air as well) A455bcd9 (talk) 14:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I use two Windows laptops of somewhat different sizes and resolutions and the current formatting works effectively on both of them -- removing it pushes the biplane image below the infobox and thus it appears in the next (World War II) section, where it doesn't belong, and sandwiches the text between itself and the image of the five officers. Certainly I'd like to see images appear nicely on all devices but not sure that's always possible, the screenshot you use doesn't look as bad to me as the biplane image appearing in the wrong section... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Got it. Removing "upright=1.2" and adding {{clear}} before the next section may solve the problem as well. A455bcd9 (talk) 08:38, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi again, I didn't remove the upright parameter but I did move the biplane image up by splitting a paragraph in the relevant section and also threw in {{clear}} for good measure, hopefully this will help. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Looks perfect, thanks! A455bcd9 (talk) 10:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Great, nice working with you on this improvement. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply